From the bestselling authors of Wittgenstein's Pokerthe quarrel that shocked the world of Enlightenment. Jean-Jacques Rousseau - philosopher, novelist, composer, educationist, political provocateur - was on the run. He was fleeing intolerance, persecution, and enemies who proclaimed him a madman, dangerous to society. David Hume, the foremost philosopher in the English language, universally praised as a model of decency, came to his aid. He brought Rousseau and his beloved little dog Sultan to England. And then it all went horribly wrong. In Rousseau's DogDavid Edmonds and John Eidinow bring their narrative verve to the bitter quarrel that turned these two Enlightenment giants into mortal foes. The result is a story of celebrity and its price, of shameless spin, of destroyed reputations and shattered friendships. It is a story of two men whose writings would forever shape our world, but whose personalities and ideas could scarcely have had less in common. And it is Wittgensteins Poker Rousseaus Dog A Tale Of Two Philosophers very human story of compassion, treachery, anger and revenge. Satın alma seçenekleri ve eklentiler. Bu ürünle ilgili bir sorun bildirin. Ürün ayrıntılarının önceki slaydı. Yayınlanma Tarihi. Tüm ayrıntıları göster. Ürün Wittgensteins Poker Rousseaus Dog A Tale Of Two Philosophers sonraki slaydı. Müşteri Yorumları. Puanlar nasıl hesaplanır? Toplam yıldız puanını ve yıldıza göre yüzde dökümünü hesaplamak için basit bir ortalama kullanmayız. Bunun yerine, sistemimiz bir yorumun ne kadar yeni olduğu ve yorum yapan kullanıcının ürünü Amazon'dan satın alıp almadığı gibi şeyleri değerlendirir. Sistemimiz, ayrıca güvenilirliği doğrulamak için yorumları analiz eder. Bu ürünü incele Düşüncelerinizi diğer müşteriler ile paylaşın. Müşteri yorumu yazın. Bu incelemedeki görüntüler. Şu ülkeden en iyi değerlendirmeler: Türkiye. Türkiye: 0 yorum ve 0 müşteri puanı var. Diğer ülkelerden en iyi değerlendirmeler. Tüm değerlendirmeleri Türkçe'ye çevir. Doğrulanmış Alışveriş. On one hand, it's possible to see this book as a description of a petty clash between two important-but-all-too-human intellectuals that elicits no more than a "So what? And that would be quite accurate. It's somewhat disconcerting to read about the foibles of two Great Minds and realize that you wouldn't want to be stuck in a stalled elevator with either one of them. On the other hand, this is a fascinating look into the affairs sometimes literally The famous spat between Rousseau and Hume took place at a time when all of the important thinkers, writers, and authors in Europe knew one another and communicated regularly and voluminously. This is even more notable because so many of the classic big names in philosophy and literature were citizens of that Republic of Letters. The interplay among these notables, all of whom had sizable egos, is what makes this book so interesting. Edmonds and Eidinow seem to specialize in recounting disputes between notable people, and that's what they do here. In reality, the dispute between Rousseau and Hume came about because Rousseau had a paranoid meltdown, and Hume reacted in an completely disproportionate manner. But in the hands of Edmonds and Eidinow, it serves as a way to recreate a lost world-- The Republic of Letters-- and to make that world real. So, the reviewers who criticize the book as nothing more than petty gossip are right, but they are missing the point. The functioning of The Republic of Letters is in reality the main character and the point of this book. It is well worth reading.
He was fleeing intolerance, persecution, and enemies who proclaimed him a madman, dangerous to society. Sistemimiz, ayrıca güvenilirliği doğrulamak için yorumları analiz eder. Tüm ayrıntıları göster. Daha fazla yorum göster. It is not fluid; the authors constantly drop new names, most of which become irrelevant just pages later. I attributed it to the fact that I wasn't familiar with the time period, I was reading it mostly late at night and I didn't care for the topic.
Klavye kısayolları
II. Dünya Savaşı sırasında donanmada görev yaptıktan sonra Antioch. From the author of Wittgenstein's Poker and Would You Kill the Fat Man?, the story of an extraordinary group of philosophers during a dark chapter in. philosophy, there are two different approaches to these questions which are the main , 45 Murat Baç, “Wittgenstein ve Anlamın Ortalıkta Olması”, Felsefe. Dog: Animal Cruelty, Self, and Society, , , Temple Two Contemporary Accounts of Martin Luther, , Alanında büyük bir etki yaratmış olan Amerikalı antropolog.This is even more notable because so many of the classic big names in philosophy and literature were citizens of that Republic of Letters. Hemen Satın Al. Most importantly, the book's topic if of no historical significance. And then it all went horribly wrong. You won't learn anything interesting and you will only be frustrated. The Murder of Professor Schlick paints an unforgettable portrait of the Vienna Circle and its members while weaving an enthralling narrative set against the backdrop of economic catastrophe and rising extremism in Hitler's Europe. Bu ürünü incele Düşüncelerinizi diğer müşteriler ile paylaşın. He was fleeing intolerance, persecution, and enemies who proclaimed him a madman, dangerous to society. Additionally, the writing itself is not very good. Sistemimiz, ayrıca güvenilirliği doğrulamak için yorumları analiz eder. Thank you. Ürün ayrıntılarının önceki slaydı. Toplam yıldız puanını ve yıldıza göre yüzde dökümünü hesaplamak için basit bir ortalama kullanmayız. I restarted it again recently, after reading about the Enlightenment period and immersing myself a little in David Hume's philosophy. He brought Rousseau and his beloved little dog Sultan to England. In reality, the dispute between Rousseau and Hume came about because Rousseau had a paranoid meltdown, and Hume reacted in an completely disproportionate manner. I attributed it to the fact that I wasn't familiar with the time period, I was reading it mostly late at night and I didn't care for the topic. My suggestion is: don't waste your time reading this. Şu ülkeden en iyi değerlendirmeler: Türkiye. It is well worth reading. Müşteri Yorumları. Bizi Takip Et Facebook Instagram. Amazon Ödeme Araçları. Müşteri yorumu yazın. Using a single incident for the jumping off point, it allows for an opening for a broad view of Enlightenment society and the state of philosophy in that era. The famous spat between Rousseau and Hume took place at a time when all of the important thinkers, writers, and authors in Europe knew one another and communicated regularly and voluminously. Murder of Professor Schlick Ekim 12, Philosophy Bites Edmonds, David. Toplam yıldız puanını ve yıldıza göre yüzde dökümünü hesaplamak için basit bir ortalama kullanmayız. Using the same formula the authors had with "Wittgenstein's Poker", this book is an excellent popular work of intellectual history. Daha fazla yorum göster. In reality, the dispute between Rousseau and Hume came about because Rousseau had a paranoid meltdown, and Hume reacted in an completely disproportionate manner. The interplay among these notables, all of whom had sizable egos, is what makes this book so interesting. Sistemimiz, ayrıca güvenilirliği doğrulamak için yorumları analiz eder. On the other hand, this is a fascinating look into the affairs sometimes literally Frankly, without even looking at the sources, one could surmise that at least some of it is based on rumors.
